Hotfix needed for new binutils (bug is in gcc)
|
|
(see http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16625)
|
|
|
|
--- ./src/resid/wave.h.orig 2004-08-13 16:25:59.000000000 +0200
|
|
+++ ./src/resid/wave.h 2004-08-13 16:28:16.000000000 +0200
|
|
@@ -462,7 +462,6 @@
|
|
// waveform output; however a switch with inline functions is faster.
|
|
|
|
switch (waveform) {
|
|
- default:
|
|
case 0x0:
|
|
return output____();
|
|
case 0x1:
|
|
@@ -471,6 +470,8 @@
|
|
return output__S_();
|
|
case 0x3:
|
|
return output__ST();
|
|
+ }
|
|
+ switch (waveform) {
|
|
case 0x4:
|
|
return output_P__();
|
|
case 0x5:
|
|
@@ -479,6 +480,8 @@
|
|
return output_PS_();
|
|
case 0x7:
|
|
return output_PST();
|
|
+ }
|
|
+ switch (waveform) {
|
|
case 0x8:
|
|
return outputN___();
|
|
case 0x9:
|
|
@@ -487,6 +490,8 @@
|
|
return outputN_S_();
|
|
case 0xb:
|
|
return outputN_ST();
|
|
+ }
|
|
+ switch (waveform) {
|
|
case 0xc:
|
|
return outputNP__();
|
|
case 0xd:
|
|
@@ -496,6 +501,7 @@
|
|
case 0xf:
|
|
return outputNPST();
|
|
}
|
|
+ return output____();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#endif // RESID_INLINING || defined(__WAVE_CC__)
|